Did you notice that Fox announced the speech that the McCain campaign refused to let her give on Tuesday night?

Randy Scheunemann was the guy spreading disinformation to boost Palin’s reputation.

Palin was devastating for McCain’s presidential race. But I’m not sure she was as bad as people are saying.

The Personnel investigation into the firing of Walt Monegan–the one conducted by three governor appointees–has cleared Sarah Palin of any wrong-doing.

Since it’s almost certainly too little too late to help the McCain-Palin ticket, I’ll review the reports sometime after we elect a new president. But this ought to explain how the Personnel board came to the contradictory conclusion as Stephen Branchflower did:

These findings differ from those of the Branchflower Report because

Gosh, Uncle Toobz’ claim that he’s not a felon sound a lot like Sarah Palin’s claim that the Branchflower report found that she hadn’t abused power.

I don’t buy that Sarah Palin will be the Republican nominee for President in 2012.

I understand why the right has grasped Palin with such enthusiasm.

John McCain has called on Uncle Toobz to resign (ignoring, of course, that he may be guilty of the same crime himself), Mitch McConnell has piled on, and even Sarah Palin has decided it is safe to take on her mentor.

But the Bush Administration? Dana Perino’s no comment sounds remarkably like the “no comment”s we got just before Bush commuted Scooter Libby’s sentence.

Robert Draper’s blog on the McCain campaign offers more delectable morsels than his NYT piece.

Sarah Palin seems to suggest Uncle Toobz ought not pay for his crimes. I wonder if that betrays worry that she’ll get busted for some of the same crimes?

How did Palin’s $150,000 wardrobe malfunction become the center of the spat between McCain and Palin?