One of the things Leahy’s PATRIOT reauthorization does is incorporate and/or undercut Feingold’s efforts supporting a more sweeping reform of domestic counterterrorism efforts.
On PATRIOTs and JUSTICE: Feingold Aims for Justice |
| By: emptywheel Wednesday September 30, 2009 9:45 am |
Leahy to Bybee: Why Won’t a Federal Judge Testify before Senate Judiciary Committee? |
| By: emptywheel Thursday May 14, 2009 12:05 pm |
Pat Leahy made it clear yesterday that Jay Bybee had blown off Leahy’s invitation to testify before SJC. I expect we’ll be hearing more about this in the future.
Anthrax: Nobody Buys the FBI Story |
| By: emptywheel Saturday September 6, 2008 1:51 pm |
It’s not just Pat Leahy who thinks the FBI story about anthrax is bogus–it’s pretty much everyone who has examined the case.
SJC Liveblog |
| By: emptywheel Wednesday July 9, 2008 8:46 am |
Michael Mukasey’s
Omnibus Liveblog |
| By: emptywheel Wednesday July 9, 2008 6:33 am |
Use this thread to liveblog EITHER the FISA debate or the Senate Mukasey hearing.
Republican No Shows on FISA Negotiation |
| By: emptywheel Thursday February 21, 2008 1:56 pm |
The Republicans purportedly negotiating FISA with Conyers, Reyes, Leahy, and Jello Jay told their staffers to skip the meeting.
SJC Mukasey Hearing, Four |
| By: emptywheel Wednesday January 30, 2008 12:24 pm |
Ben Cardin, Pat Leahy, and Sheldon Whitehouse question Mukasey.
SJC Mukasey Hearing, Part Three |
| By: emptywheel Wednesday January 30, 2008 11:13 am |
Arlen Specter, Chuck Grassley, Chuck Schumer, John Cornyn, Pat Leahy, and Sheldon Whitehouse question Mukasey (beginning of second round).
SJC Mukasey Hearing |
| By: emptywheel Wednesday January 30, 2008 7:06 am |
Arlen Specter, Chuck Grassley, Herb Kohl, Jeff Sessions, Joe Biden, Pat Leahy, Sam Brownback, and Ted Kennedy question Mukasey.
Oversight or Politics? |
| By: emptywheel Friday December 14, 2007 3:21 pm |
Michael Mukasey has engaged in a remarkable bit of sophistry with his refusal to clue Congress in on the joint DOJ/CIA IG investigation into the destruction of the torture tapes. He explains his decision as an attempt to avoid “any perception that our law enforcement decisions are subject to political influence.”
Of course, the “political influence” Mukasey was asked to address during his nomination hearings was the kind exerted when a Senator or a Congresswoman called the Attorney General privately to demand that a USA either accelerate the prosecution of a political figure or be fired. In this matter, Mukasey has been asked to respond to what is an almost unparalleled degree of bipartisan support for an open inquiry into a matter that just stinks, already, of a cover-up. Leahy and Specter (and Reyes and Hoekstra and Durbin and Biden and more) called for a procedure that had oversight built in.
And Mukasey said no.


7 Comments






Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Emptywheel





RSS/XML Feed