Here’s the factual story about Bush’s decision not to pardon Scooter Libby.
The Libby Non-Pardon: From the Department of Pre-Spin |
| By: emptywheel Saturday July 25, 2009 2:31 pm |
The Bush Fairy Tale on the Libby Pardon |
| By: emptywheel Thursday July 23, 2009 7:47 am |
Time has allowed a bunch of Bush partisans to put a nice spin on his non-pardon of Libby.
Gonzales Resigned 17 Days After This IG Investigation Began |
| By: emptywheel Tuesday September 2, 2008 9:52 am |
Did Fred Fielding report Gonzales’ loose treatment of TS/SCI information to chase him out of the Administration?
If the Questions Are So “Novel” Then How Can You Argue the Privilege Exists?!?!? |
| By: emptywheel Friday August 8, 2008 3:38 pm |
Fred Fielding, with a straight face, admits that he and the White House were just making shit up when they invented “absolute immunity.”
David Iglesias Doesn’t Think Those Were Karl Rove’s “Official Duties,” Either |
| By: emptywheel Tuesday July 22, 2008 11:42 am |
Like Don Siegelman, David Iglesias doesn’t buy Fred Fielding’s claim that Rove’s subpoena pertained to Rove’s “official duties.”
How Could It POSSIBLY Be Part of Karl Rove’s “Official Duties” to Hijack DOJ? |
| By: emptywheel Monday July 21, 2008 2:55 pm |
Don Siegelman responds to the question I’ve been asking for over a week: How can Fred Fielding claim that it was part of Rove’s “official duties” to conduct witch hunts against Democrats?
DOJ Doesn’t Want to Say Whether It Agrees that Karl’s “Official Duties” Include Witch Hunts |
| By: emptywheel Thursday July 17, 2008 12:13 pm |
I have to conclude that Peter Carr doesn’t want to say whether or not DOJ advise Fred Fielding that Rove’s “Official Duties” involve witch hunts against Democrats. I wonder why that is.
DOJ Apparently Doesn’t Know Whether It Told Fielding that Rove’s “Official Duties” Include Witch Hunts |
| By: emptywheel Friday July 11, 2008 2:51 pm |
Now why do you think the DOJ is having such a tough time answering a very simple question: whether or not they did–as Fred Fielding has claimed–tell the White House that Karl Rove’s alleged actions in the Siegelman prosecution were part of his “official duties” while at the White House?
The Significance of the “Official Duties” Claim |
| By: emptywheel Friday July 11, 2008 7:54 am |
Up until the moment when Fred Fielding claimed Rove’s actions in the Siegelman affair were part of his “official duties,” those actions, by themselves, may not have been illegal. But as soon as Siegelman made that claim, they became clear Hatch Act violations.
Bush Did NOT Invoke Executive Privilege for Rove |
| By: emptywheel Thursday July 10, 2008 1:48 pm |
Just about everyone believes that Bush invoked executive privilege to prevent Rove from having to testify today. But that’s not what happened.


146 Comments






Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Emptywheel





RSS/XML Feed