Cheney revealed a meeting with Bush at which Wilson was discussed. And right after that, Rove talked at the senior staff meeting about hitting back at Wilson.
Bush’s July 7, 2003 Discussion about Wilson |
| By: emptywheel Friday October 30, 2009 5:40 pm |
Condi’s Okay Came After OLC Approval |
| By: emptywheel Tuesday August 25, 2009 11:29 am |
When Condi approved torture on July 17, 2002, John Yoo had already given John Rizzo a two-page letter broadly excusing torture.
All the News NYT Does Not See Fit to Print |
| By: emptywheel Saturday June 6, 2009 1:02 pm |
The NYT got a handful of emails that made it clear that Jim Comey had attempted to dissuade the Bush Administration from torture. But instead, it reported that he had approved of torture. Here’s the other stuff the NYT doesn’t seem fit to tell you about Comey’s emails.
Richard Clarke Reminds Cheney and Condi of Their Incompetence |
| By: emptywheel Sunday May 31, 2009 5:35 am |
Richard Clarke thinks Cheney and Condi should stop using their lack of preparedness for 9/11 as an excuse for breaking the law in response.
Why Did Tenet Create a False Record on the Day After He “Quit”? |
| By: emptywheel Wednesday May 27, 2009 9:11 am |
Did Condi Rice and George Tenet build plausible deniability into Bush’s written endorsement of torture.
Did Abu Zubaydah’s Torture Begin After May 28, 2002? |
| By: emptywheel Friday May 22, 2009 12:38 pm |
I increasingly suspect that the torture index provided to ACLU may better pinpoint the day when Abu Zubaydah’s torture began. Here are they key datapoints.
April 13, 2002: CIA starts taping Abu Zubaydah interrogations.
April 16, 2002: Bruce Jessen circulates draft exploitation plan to JPRA Commander.
April 2002: CIA OGC lawyers begin conversations with John Bellinger and John Yoo/Jay Bybee on proposed interrogation plan for Abu Zubaydah.
Interrogation and Response–the Democratic Way |
| By: emptywheel Thursday May 7, 2009 8:00 am |
Okay, I lied. I’m going to throw up a quick post.
I wanted to direct your attention to Scott Horton’s interview of the Stanford students who challenged Condi Rice on her role in torture. In particular, I wanted to point to the comments of Sammy Abusrur–whose friends are now calling him “Frost”–about Condi’s role over all as National Security Advisor and Secretary of State.
I am not a political scientist, nor an international
If Condi Says “Nixon” Directly Rather than Through Anonymous Sources, Does the NYT Hear? |
| By: emptywheel Sunday May 3, 2009 8:00 pm |
If Condi had said, “By definition, if it was authorized by the President, it did not violate our obligations in the Convention Against Torture,” to the NYT via anonymous sources, THEN would they consider it news?
Rice and Goss Turn on Cheney |
| By: emptywheel Sunday May 3, 2009 1:12 pm |
People close to Condi Rice and Porter Goss appear to be significant sources for a NYT article adding new data points to the torture narrative. They’re self-serving. But if Condi and Goss want to turn on Cheney, I’ll take it.
Condi: If It Smells Like Nixon, It’s Criminal |
| By: emptywheel Thursday April 30, 2009 6:18 am |
Condi channels Nixon to defend torture.


32 Comments






Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Emptywheel





RSS/XML Feed