<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another &#8220;Good Max&#8221; Sighting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:48:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SparklestheIguana</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187457</link>
		<dc:creator>SparklestheIguana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 01:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187457</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ha!  Awesome visual.  That is the 70s bowl cut Rahm was meant to have.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  Awesome visual.  That is the 70s bowl cut Rahm was meant to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix Woman</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187315</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187315</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I take it to mean that Bad Max was kept in check by Teddy, and when Teddy was out of the picture, Bad Max ran riot — though really, you are right:  If it was just a matter of waiting for Teddy to go away, why was he still making Good Max noises as late as April?  The May appearance of the lobbyists makes sense as the trigger, if for no other reason than that their presence confirmed that Teddy was no longer a threat to them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it to mean that Bad Max was kept in check by Teddy, and when Teddy was out of the picture, Bad Max ran riot — though really, you are right:  If it was just a matter of waiting for Teddy to go away, why was he still making Good Max noises as late as April?  The May appearance of the lobbyists makes sense as the trigger, if for no other reason than that their presence confirmed that Teddy was no longer a threat to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlofhuntingdon</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187313</link>
		<dc:creator>earlofhuntingdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187313</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The effect was a bit like shutting down a primary challenge against Baucus: His surprising leftward lurch stopped entirely, and he drifted back to the more centrist approaches that had defined his career.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How often will we have to point out that Baucus and the Blue Dogs are as much in the “center” of the political infield as a first base coach?  The only thing he and his peers are at the center of is their own ambition.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>The effect was a bit like shutting down a primary challenge against Baucus: His surprising leftward lurch stopped entirely, and he drifted back to the more centrist approaches that had defined his career.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>How often will we have to point out that Baucus and the Blue Dogs are as much in the “center” of the political infield as a first base coach?  The only thing he and his peers are at the center of is their own ambition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmaz</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187282</link>
		<dc:creator>bmaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I dunno, the picture alone tells me everything I really wanted to know about Baucus.  The post as is really is pithy!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, the picture alone tells me everything I really wanted to know about Baucus.  The post as is really is pithy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emptywheel</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187280</link>
		<dc:creator>emptywheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187280</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ug. Having post issues. Will fix.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ug. Having post issues. Will fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phred</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187279</link>
		<dc:creator>phred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187279</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Given the general spinelessness of Congressional Dems, my vote goes to Rahm hiding behind Bad Max.  Further, given your next post about the dishonesty of the WH’s circulation of polling data, there is simply no one left to blame this on but the WH.  Obama won’t make a pitch for the public option next week, because he’s still smoking his cigarette after his lobbyist tryst.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In some ways though, I’m ok with this.  PO is turning out to be a weak and duplicitous President.  Perhaps this is the opening that Congress needs to reassert its own damn authority.  The executive branch doesn’t write legislation, Congress does.  And Congress critters might be more easily persuaded by threats from their constituents to vote them out of office if they don’t start working for us.  Maybe PO will bring about an end to the unitary executive, but not in the way we had expected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wouldn’t it be deliciously ironic if PO had to veto health care reform legislation because Congress sent him a bill without all the corporate sweetheart deals?  I know I’m dreaming, but I would dearly love to see that : )&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the general spinelessness of Congressional Dems, my vote goes to Rahm hiding behind Bad Max.  Further, given your next post about the dishonesty of the WH’s circulation of polling data, there is simply no one left to blame this on but the WH.  Obama won’t make a pitch for the public option next week, because he’s still smoking his cigarette after his lobbyist tryst.</p>
<p>In some ways though, I’m ok with this.  PO is turning out to be a weak and duplicitous President.  Perhaps this is the opening that Congress needs to reassert its own damn authority.  The executive branch doesn’t write legislation, Congress does.  And Congress critters might be more easily persuaded by threats from their constituents to vote them out of office if they don’t start working for us.  Maybe PO will bring about an end to the unitary executive, but not in the way we had expected.</p>
<p>Wouldn’t it be deliciously ironic if PO had to veto health care reform legislation because Congress sent him a bill without all the corporate sweetheart deals?  I know I’m dreaming, but I would dearly love to see that : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosalind</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187277</link>
		<dc:creator>rosalind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/04/another-good-max-sighting/#comment-187277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;psst: first sentence - &lt;strike&gt;nothing&lt;/strike&gt; noting&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>psst: first sentence &#8211; <strike>nothing</strike> noting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.265 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 10:24:26 -->

