Wow, but I find that sleazy. Trying to present himself as a noble guy who recognizes the GCs, but then winking and nudging his listeners into agreeing that the terrists should be convicted anyway.

Anybody can say whatever they like on the internet — in their own blog.

It’s incredibly difficult for other people to work collaboratively on investigative work when they are derailed and in this case, immediately. By now you already should understand freep’s role in the community, which would be less disruptive if people stopped pointing to it and stayed on topic.

Mary (108) — and by now after all his abuse, how would we ever find out given Padilla’s broken mind whether he’d been subjected to torture, or if he’d been subjected to testing which was coincidentally torture. The description of some of the missing videos as “clinical” haunts me.

Of course, during the Obama administration there is no GWOT, so now there is 0% recidivism. Ha!

One has to have a degree of confidence that individuals that have conducted such extremist activity would indeed be found guilty in our courts of law.

So does his statement include those who dreamed all this up and twisted the law to justify it? Or is he saying that only those who actually committed the acts of torture?

In addition: The ICRC report says we tortured, the recent U.N. report says we probably committed war crimes, and now Gen.Pet. says we violated the GC.

I wonder when, if ever, our government is going to do something about it?

And that’s pretty much what the case law is making thing ripe for – from Padilla to several other cases where hooded torture guys gave evidences without court objections

This is precisely the type of behavior that characterized the Bush Administration where silencing differing opinions is concerned. Attacking the messenger – turning the community at large against him/her – is called Swiftboating. It’s a Rovian tactic.

Censorship takes many forms, all of which are repugnant.

This is not Argentina.