<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wood v. Kagan on Executive Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:48:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4jkb4ia</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161429</link>
		<dc:creator>4jkb4ia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161429</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“&lt;i&gt;This&lt;/i&gt; mall” fixes the scanning. It introduces an explicit Obama-King comparison however.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“<i>This</i> mall” fixes the scanning. It introduces an explicit Obama-King comparison however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4jkb4ia</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161427</link>
		<dc:creator>4jkb4ia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161427</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Better yet, these people may have some opportunity to challenge their detention according to what the other two branches say about it. The problem with indefinite detention is the “no charge” part.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better yet, these people may have some opportunity to challenge their detention according to what the other two branches say about it. The problem with indefinite detention is the “no charge” part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4jkb4ia</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161426</link>
		<dc:creator>4jkb4ia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161426</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;On Orion’s other post, I don’t think anyone who has come out against preventive detention has mentioned habeas. Armando keeps hitting that if these people are POWs you give them some right to say if they are rightly held or not, but that’s not habeas. Habeas is for criminal cases.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Orion’s other post, I don’t think anyone who has come out against preventive detention has mentioned habeas. Armando keeps hitting that if these people are POWs you give them some right to say if they are rightly held or not, but that’s not habeas. Habeas is for criminal cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4jkb4ia</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161425</link>
		<dc:creator>4jkb4ia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161425</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“A mall in Washington” scans a lot better than “the Washington Mall”.  He might have said “a large green space” or something similar. But the word mall is mythic in the context of the March on Washington IMHO. It has little to do with a shopping mall.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“A mall in Washington” scans a lot better than “the Washington Mall”.  He might have said “a large green space” or something similar. But the word mall is mythic in the context of the March on Washington IMHO. It has little to do with a shopping mall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freepatriot</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161418</link>
		<dc:creator>freepatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 06:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161418</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;great&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/05/how_a_government_mole_won_the_loyalty_of_the_newbu.php?ref=fpblg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the FBI just handed the terrorist a “How to” recruiting manual&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fookin brilliant&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;does anybody ever think this shit thru ???&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great</p>
<p><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/05/how_a_government_mole_won_the_loyalty_of_the_newbu.php?ref=fpblg" rel="nofollow">the FBI just handed the terrorist a “How to” recruiting manual</a></p>
<p>fookin brilliant</p>
<p>does anybody ever think this shit thru ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freepatriot</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161417</link>
		<dc:creator>freepatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161417</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;NO to Kagan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can figure that much out&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;hat tip to fatster&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO to Kagan</p>
<p>I can figure that much out</p>
<p><em>hat tip to fatster</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatster</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161416</link>
		<dc:creator>fatster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161416</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;FWIW:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New York Times:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The president has narrowed his list to four, according to people close to the White House — two federal appeals judges, Sonia Sotomayor of New York and Diane P. Wood of Chicago, and two members of his administration, Solicitor General Elena Kagan and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thepage.time.com/final-four/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://thepage.time.com/final-four/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW:</p>
<p>New York Times:</p>
<p>“The president has narrowed his list to four, according to people close to the White House — two federal appeals judges, Sonia Sotomayor of New York and Diane P. Wood of Chicago, and two members of his administration, Solicitor General Elena Kagan and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.”</p>
<p><a href="http://thepage.time.com/final-four/" rel="nofollow">http://thepage.time.com/final-four/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orionATL</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161415</link>
		<dc:creator>orionATL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161415</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;loo hoo @54&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i may be; it wouldn’t be the first time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;my comment is not intended merely as a slur, but as an observation, and as a prediction, a hypothesis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;just keep it in mind and test it out from time to time; we have at least four years of this guy to gauge where he is coming from.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;oh, and this,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from obama’s acceptance speech to the demo natl convention. i had to go back and check the transcript to be sure i had heard what i thought i had heard:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“…And it is that promise that 45 years ago today, brought Americans from every corner of this land to stand together on a mall in Washington, before Lincoln’s Memorial, and hear a young preacher from Georgia speak of his dream.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“…to stand together on A mall in washington…”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;who calls the washington mall, the campground of american democracy, “a mall in washington”?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;our prez, that’s who.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;you expect a person who speaks this way to have a feel for the british and colonial governor’s despotism that gave rise to the  bill of rights?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;to be worried about the abuse inherent in “state secrets”, in “preventive detention”, i.e., ignoring habeas corpus?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;to be HIGHLY protective of the bill of rights freedoms? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;to repeat, you’ve plenty of time to observe and decide just how absurd my comment is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loo hoo @54</p>
<p>i may be; it wouldn’t be the first time.</p>
<p>my comment is not intended merely as a slur, but as an observation, and as a prediction, a hypothesis.</p>
<p>just keep it in mind and test it out from time to time; we have at least four years of this guy to gauge where he is coming from.</p>
<p>oh, and this,</p>
<p>from obama’s acceptance speech to the demo natl convention. i had to go back and check the transcript to be sure i had heard what i thought i had heard:</p>
<p>“…And it is that promise that 45 years ago today, brought Americans from every corner of this land to stand together on a mall in Washington, before Lincoln’s Memorial, and hear a young preacher from Georgia speak of his dream.”</p>
<p>“…to stand together on A mall in washington…”</p>
<p>who calls the washington mall, the campground of american democracy, “a mall in washington”?</p>
<p>our prez, that’s who.</p>
<p>you expect a person who speaks this way to have a feel for the british and colonial governor’s despotism that gave rise to the  bill of rights?</p>
<p>to be worried about the abuse inherent in “state secrets”, in “preventive detention”, i.e., ignoring habeas corpus?</p>
<p>to be HIGHLY protective of the bill of rights freedoms? </p>
<p>to repeat, you’ve plenty of time to observe and decide just how absurd my comment is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatster</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161414</link>
		<dc:creator>fatster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 03:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161414</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;New Justice Could Hold the Key to Presidential Power&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By CHARLIE SAVAGE&lt;br /&gt;
Published: May 24, 2009&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON — “As President Obama prepares to replace Justice David H. Souter on the Supreme Court, conventional wisdom says his nominee will have little chance to change the court because all the contenders appear to share Justice Souter’s approach on social issues, like abortion rights.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“But the effect on presidential power could be pivotal. Important rulings on executive authority — striking down military commissions and upholding habeas corpus rights for Guantánamo detainees — have been decided by a five-vote majority, including Justice Souter, on the nine-member court.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/25/us/politics/25power.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05.....power.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Justice Could Hold the Key to Presidential Power</p>
<p>By CHARLIE SAVAGE<br />
Published: May 24, 2009</p>
<p>WASHINGTON — “As President Obama prepares to replace Justice David H. Souter on the Supreme Court, conventional wisdom says his nominee will have little chance to change the court because all the contenders appear to share Justice Souter’s approach on social issues, like abortion rights.</p>
<p>“But the effect on presidential power could be pivotal. Important rulings on executive authority — striking down military commissions and upholding habeas corpus rights for Guantánamo detainees — have been decided by a five-vote majority, including Justice Souter, on the nine-member court.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/25/us/politics/25power.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05&#8230;..power.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loo Hoo.</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161413</link>
		<dc:creator>Loo Hoo.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/25/wood-v-kagan-on-executive-power/#comment-161413</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;orion, I think you’re blowing things out of whack.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>orion, I think you’re blowing things out of whack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.230 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 03:58:51 -->

