I think Pelosi has more credibility than managers at the CIA, but that is saying very little. Even if one had only the reports from the MSM, by 2002 or 2003, wouldn’t any semi-sentient being have at least suspected that the Bush people were torturing captives? The signs were everywhere in the rhetoric and in the administration’s general conduct in the runup to Iraq. Yet the members of the Congress club continue to act like they were shocked! shocked to find that illegal acts were going on!

A Congressman needs to be either more conscientious/honest than that or more perceptive, in my opinion. Pelosi has still seriously sullied her reputation by letting this happen unchallenged.

I’m sure you are on this EW, but wtf?
Is this just to calm the staff over at CIA?
And isn’t that stupid since it will be misused?

Or is this just already being used as a new talking point against Pelosi?

1) people were supposed to be informed;
2) if informed, they were supposed to object.
3) if someone was informed and they did not object then they are, according to no less an authority than Rove, ”complicit” in torture.

And the questions are:

1) who was informed?
2) when were they informed?
3) what did they do about it?

Now …
* in order to ”get” Pelosi, the R’s will say the CIA is unimpeachable, they were fully informed, Pelosi is lying, and Pelosi is a war criminal.

EXCEPT, there is just one itty bitty little problem …
If the R’s are going to claim they were informed and that is the ”proof” that Pelosi was informed ….

THEN we need to get rid of various R’s as well as Pelosi.

I’m cool with that.

Let’s see all the documents.
Let’s get answers to all the questions.
ABOUT EVERYBODY.