<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Credit Where Due: Keith Olbermann Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:51:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DWIGHTBAKER</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-146930</link>
		<dc:creator>DWIGHTBAKER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/#comment-146930</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In the United States, the power of the federal judiciary to review and invalidate unconstitutional acts of the federal executive branch is stated in the constitution, Article III sections 1 and 2: “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. … The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority…” The first famous statement of “the judicial power” was Marbury v. Madison. Later cases interpreted the “judicial power” of Article III to establish the power of federal courts to consider or overturn any action of congress or of any state that conflicts with the constitution.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, the power of the federal judiciary to review and invalidate unconstitutional acts of the federal executive branch is stated in the constitution, Article III sections 1 and 2: “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. … The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority…” The first famous statement of “the judicial power” was Marbury v. Madison. Later cases interpreted the “judicial power” of Article III to establish the power of federal courts to consider or overturn any action of congress or of any state that conflicts with the constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robt</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-146929</link>
		<dc:creator>Robt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/#comment-146929</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It really doesn’t matter itf we have a Marian President with a 300% favorable rating.  Civil liberties need to be adhered even for Obama.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Otherwise it is like Bush said, ” dictatorships aren’t so bad, as long as I’m the dictator”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Besides, if Eric Holder can’t find the political spine to appoint a independent prosecutor to settle the accused Bush criminal abuses.  when the president is republican and it most likely will be some day.  Bush will pale in retrospect.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really doesn’t matter itf we have a Marian President with a 300% favorable rating.  Civil liberties need to be adhered even for Obama.</p>
<p>Otherwise it is like Bush said, ” dictatorships aren’t so bad, as long as I’m the dictator”.</p>
<p>Besides, if Eric Holder can’t find the political spine to appoint a independent prosecutor to settle the accused Bush criminal abuses.  when the president is republican and it most likely will be some day.  Bush will pale in retrospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spokane61</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-146876</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokane61</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/#comment-146876</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Letter to the White House responding to Keiths show.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sir,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As an American and a former supporter of yours, I am writing to tell you of my deep disappointment and growing disgust for your idea of what constitutes American Justice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Obama Administration Embraces Bush Position on Warrantless Wiretapping and Secrecy&lt;br /&gt;
Says Court Must Dismiss Jewel v. NSA to Protect ‘State Secrets’&lt;br /&gt;
San Francisco - The Obama administration formally adopted the Bush administration’s position that the courts cannot judge the legality of the National Security Agency’s (NSA’s) warrantless wiretapping program, filing a motion to dismiss Jewel v. NSA late Friday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Jewel v. NSA, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is challenging the agency’s dragnet surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans. The Obama Justice Department claims in its motion that litigation over the wiretapping program would require the government to disclose privileged “state secrets.” These are essentially the same arguments made by the Bush administration three years ago in Hepting v. AT&amp;T, EFF’s lawsuit against one of the telecom giants complicit in the NSA spying.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“President Obama promised the American people a new era of transparency, accountability, and respect for civil liberties,” said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. “But with the Obama Justice Department continuing the Bush administration’s cover-up of the National Security Agency’s dragnet surveillance of millions of Americans, and insisting that the much-publicized warrantless wiretapping program is still a ’secret’ that cannot be reviewed by the courts, it feels like deja vu all over again.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Federal Court Case 3:08-cv-04373-VRW Document 18 Filed 04/03/2009&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You (by means of your minions) said “PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on June 25, 2009 at 2:30 p.m., before Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker, the Government Defendants sued in their official capacity in this action will move to dismiss certain claims in the Complaint against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for summary judgment as to any remaining claims pursuant to Rule 56. The grounds for this motion are that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction with respect to plaintiffs’ statutory claims against the United States because Congress has not waived sovereign immunity and summary judgment for the Government on all of plaintiffs’ remaining claims against all parties (including any claims not dismissed for lack of jurisdiction) is required because information necessary to litigate plaintiffs’ claims is properly subject to and excluded from use in this case by the state secrets privilege and related statutory privileges. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You sir, do not deserve the office of President. This unconstitutional assault on the civil rights of Americans shows your utter disrespect both for the laws of the nation and for those of us who voted for you. Be assured that I shall do everything in my power as a citizen to see you impeached and tried for High Crimes against the people of the United States of America.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Letter to the White House responding to Keiths show.</p>
<p>Sir,</p>
<p>As an American and a former supporter of yours, I am writing to tell you of my deep disappointment and growing disgust for your idea of what constitutes American Justice.</p>
<p>“Obama Administration Embraces Bush Position on Warrantless Wiretapping and Secrecy<br />
Says Court Must Dismiss Jewel v. NSA to Protect ‘State Secrets’<br />
San Francisco &#8211; The Obama administration formally adopted the Bush administration’s position that the courts cannot judge the legality of the National Security Agency’s (NSA’s) warrantless wiretapping program, filing a motion to dismiss Jewel v. NSA late Friday.</p>
<p>In Jewel v. NSA, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is challenging the agency’s dragnet surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans. The Obama Justice Department claims in its motion that litigation over the wiretapping program would require the government to disclose privileged “state secrets.” These are essentially the same arguments made by the Bush administration three years ago in Hepting v. AT&amp;T, EFF’s lawsuit against one of the telecom giants complicit in the NSA spying.</p>
<p>“President Obama promised the American people a new era of transparency, accountability, and respect for civil liberties,” said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. “But with the Obama Justice Department continuing the Bush administration’s cover-up of the National Security Agency’s dragnet surveillance of millions of Americans, and insisting that the much-publicized warrantless wiretapping program is still a ’secret’ that cannot be reviewed by the courts, it feels like deja vu all over again.”</p>
<p>In Federal Court Case 3:08-cv-04373-VRW Document 18 Filed 04/03/2009</p>
<p>You (by means of your minions) said “PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on June 25, 2009 at 2:30 p.m., before Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker, the Government Defendants sued in their official capacity in this action will move to dismiss certain claims in the Complaint against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for summary judgment as to any remaining claims pursuant to Rule 56. The grounds for this motion are that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction with respect to plaintiffs’ statutory claims against the United States because Congress has not waived sovereign immunity and summary judgment for the Government on all of plaintiffs’ remaining claims against all parties (including any claims not dismissed for lack of jurisdiction) is required because information necessary to litigate plaintiffs’ claims is properly subject to and excluded from use in this case by the state secrets privilege and related statutory privileges. </p>
<p>You sir, do not deserve the office of President. This unconstitutional assault on the civil rights of Americans shows your utter disrespect both for the laws of the nation and for those of us who voted for you. Be assured that I shall do everything in my power as a citizen to see you impeached and tried for High Crimes against the people of the United States of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larue</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-146867</link>
		<dc:creator>Larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/#comment-146867</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, after a quick skim thru comments, a big thanks to all . . . good stuff there, also, as always. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Slainte Mtah!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, after a quick skim thru comments, a big thanks to all . . . good stuff there, also, as always. </p>
<p>Slainte Mtah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larue</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-146865</link>
		<dc:creator>Larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/#comment-146865</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BMAZ The DAZZ! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dazziling us all, again. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good stuff, thanks for posting it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMAZ The DAZZ! </p>
<p>Dazziling us all, again. </p>
<p>Good stuff, thanks for posting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timtimes</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-146863</link>
		<dc:creator>timtimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/#comment-146863</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your weed won’t be freed just right now.&lt;br /&gt;
I’m too busy tapping your phones.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Enjoy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your weed won’t be freed just right now.<br />
I’m too busy tapping your phones.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbl2</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-146862</link>
		<dc:creator>cbl2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/#comment-146862</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hey bmaz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/asu-stiffs-obama-claim-to_b_185296.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ASU &lt;em&gt;whiffs&lt;/em&gt; POTUS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;will not confer an honorary degree on this year’s commencement speaker, President Barack Obama, because “his body of work is yet to come.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey bmaz</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dawn-teo/asu-stiffs-obama-claim-to_b_185296.html" rel="nofollow">ASU <em>whiffs</em> POTUS</a></p>
<blockquote><p>will not confer an honorary degree on this year’s commencement speaker, President Barack Obama, because “his body of work is yet to come.”</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbl2</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-146858</link>
		<dc:creator>cbl2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/#comment-146858</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;per your question last thread -&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;saw mention of Jane’s appearance on the twitter page - but didn’t see it until halfway through the show - so don’t know if she was on in the first 30 min.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>per your question last thread -</p>
<p>saw mention of Jane’s appearance on the twitter page &#8211; but didn’t see it until halfway through the show &#8211; so don’t know if she was on in the first 30 min.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernDragon</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-146857</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernDragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/#comment-146857</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Gators are Devil bait!”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means unpleasantries.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Gators are Devil bait!”</p>
<p>This means unpleasantries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dosido</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-146855</link>
		<dc:creator>dosido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/04/08/credit-where-due-keith-olbermann-edition/#comment-146855</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was rather hoping that the new AG and administration were busy “tenting” the DOJ to get all the foundation destroying pests out.  Guess not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Really disappointing.  Esp. from a constitutional scholar.  gag.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was rather hoping that the new AG and administration were busy “tenting” the DOJ to get all the foundation destroying pests out.  Guess not.</p>
<p>Really disappointing.  Esp. from a constitutional scholar.  gag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
