<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS A Go Go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:24:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NMvoiceofreason</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/comment-page-1/#comment-116462</link>
		<dc:creator>NMvoiceofreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/#comment-116462</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As I have pointed out before, this is a losing proposition. If you want to remain in the 5-4 minority forever, be my guest. But I would turn the Supreme Court of the Republican Party back into the Supreme Court of the United States by passing a court restructuring of 15 Justices, requiring them to have argument and written, signed opinions on all cases, instead of being lazy lawyers and only doing 1% of the work assigned to them. If they had to spell out why everyone they think should die should die, and justify it on the merits of the record before them, we’d have a lot less people executed in this country, and no more embarrassments like Bush v. Gore.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have pointed out before, this is a losing proposition. If you want to remain in the 5-4 minority forever, be my guest. But I would turn the Supreme Court of the Republican Party back into the Supreme Court of the United States by passing a court restructuring of 15 Justices, requiring them to have argument and written, signed opinions on all cases, instead of being lazy lawyers and only doing 1% of the work assigned to them. If they had to spell out why everyone they think should die should die, and justify it on the merits of the record before them, we’d have a lot less people executed in this country, and no more embarrassments like Bush v. Gore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmaz</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/comment-page-1/#comment-116432</link>
		<dc:creator>bmaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/#comment-116432</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Maritime?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s not He of the Law of the Sea Capt. Jack you are referring to, surely?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Maritime?</p>
<p>That’s not He of the Law of the Sea Capt. Jack you are referring to, surely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/comment-page-1/#comment-116423</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/#comment-116423</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;52 - While I meant someone under the radar who won’t give the contentious cruisers as much red meat, but will end up being on the side of the angels, I’m going to have to stick up more specifically for Mr. Maritime - IMO, Souter is a very very smart guy who is able to pick up any thread, sees all the layers of the onion and the onion at the same time, and has the kind of demeanor that is reassuring on the Court.  I’d be very happy with another one like him and I think if you start pulling names of activists - like Scheck, if they have any integrity you end up losing their votes on the issues near and dear, bc in good faith they should recuse on issues where they have been longstanding advocates for a specific outcome on a specific issue.  JMO&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>52 &#8211; While I meant someone under the radar who won’t give the contentious cruisers as much red meat, but will end up being on the side of the angels, I’m going to have to stick up more specifically for Mr. Maritime &#8211; IMO, Souter is a very very smart guy who is able to pick up any thread, sees all the layers of the onion and the onion at the same time, and has the kind of demeanor that is reassuring on the Court.  I’d be very happy with another one like him and I think if you start pulling names of activists &#8211; like Scheck, if they have any integrity you end up losing their votes on the issues near and dear, bc in good faith they should recuse on issues where they have been longstanding advocates for a specific outcome on a specific issue.  JMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmaz</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/comment-page-1/#comment-116394</link>
		<dc:creator>bmaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/#comment-116394</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I had the ease of being almost certain she was going one way or another; I just wanted to get her to AG.  If not there DHS will be a good job for her.  She was a goner from here either way though.  If i had any thought that she might stay, I might have argued differently; but that just wasn’t going to happen.  Our current AG, Terry Goddard is a decent guy from a long time political family here.  He is termed out from AG in 2010 and will run either for governor or Senate.  My guess is governor.  Other than that though, we got nuthin for strong Dem candidates.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I had the ease of being almost certain she was going one way or another; I just wanted to get her to AG.  If not there DHS will be a good job for her.  She was a goner from here either way though.  If i had any thought that she might stay, I might have argued differently; but that just wasn’t going to happen.  Our current AG, Terry Goddard is a decent guy from a long time political family here.  He is termed out from AG in 2010 and will run either for governor or Senate.  My guess is governor.  Other than that though, we got nuthin for strong Dem candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LabDancer</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/comment-page-1/#comment-116392</link>
		<dc:creator>LabDancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/#comment-116392</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I dunno - the folks in Arizona seem to have shown a remarkable degree of tolerance for choleric outbursts from their elected representatives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Look: you don’t actually have to BE corrupt - tell ‘em you completely open to being bought, then stiff ‘em all!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A useful strategy that a lot of wingers have used is to make up an imaginary enemy and run to protect America for them. Remember Tricky Dick and the Red Menace? He made out like a bandit with that. Since it’s so hard to actually think like a winger, you could always try channeling a particularly creative conspiracy theorist, say Jim Garrison. If you’re not into seances, then I’m not trying to be mean here] freep seems to have an unerring sense of what gets wingers into a flap. Plus Obama’s done an awful lot to give Blue Dogs something to run on, so maybe you could get an endorsement from that bunch and combine it with whatever essentially fictional but nonetheless electorally plausible menace that freep suggests.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Really man, I think you have to come up with something: it was you who pushed and pushed for Obama to give Napolitano a meaningful job in WDC, and now there’s this specter of McFraud with only a giant dead cactus standing between him and picking up the mantle of Toobz.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno &#8211; the folks in Arizona seem to have shown a remarkable degree of tolerance for choleric outbursts from their elected representatives.</p>
<p>Look: you don’t actually have to BE corrupt &#8211; tell ‘em you completely open to being bought, then stiff ‘em all!</p>
<p>A useful strategy that a lot of wingers have used is to make up an imaginary enemy and run to protect America for them. Remember Tricky Dick and the Red Menace? He made out like a bandit with that. Since it’s so hard to actually think like a winger, you could always try channeling a particularly creative conspiracy theorist, say Jim Garrison. If you’re not into seances, then I’m not trying to be mean here] freep seems to have an unerring sense of what gets wingers into a flap. Plus Obama’s done an awful lot to give Blue Dogs something to run on, so maybe you could get an endorsement from that bunch and combine it with whatever essentially fictional but nonetheless electorally plausible menace that freep suggests.</p>
<p>Really man, I think you have to come up with something: it was you who pushed and pushed for Obama to give Napolitano a meaningful job in WDC, and now there’s this specter of McFraud with only a giant dead cactus standing between him and picking up the mantle of Toobz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrWhy</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/comment-page-1/#comment-116391</link>
		<dc:creator>MrWhy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/#comment-116391</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you want to see heads explode, we should argue for Anita Hill.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to see heads explode, we should argue for Anita Hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrWhy</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/comment-page-1/#comment-116390</link>
		<dc:creator>MrWhy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/#comment-116390</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;or Neal Katyal or Philip Sundel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or Neal Katyal or Philip Sundel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmaz</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/comment-page-1/#comment-116389</link>
		<dc:creator>bmaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/#comment-116389</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I crack up every time mentions me getting elected to anything.  Ever.  I am likely the the most unelectable piece of human protoplasm ever in existence.  Not to mention that my interaction with the press and public would probably make Bobby Knight and Bill Parcells look smooth and pleasant.  I can’t even get elected head of my own household; the wife has that position nailed down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Man, can you imagine running for some office these days?  I am surprised as many people as do actually choose to undergo that gauntlet of stupidity and inanity.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I crack up every time mentions me getting elected to anything.  Ever.  I am likely the the most unelectable piece of human protoplasm ever in existence.  Not to mention that my interaction with the press and public would probably make Bobby Knight and Bill Parcells look smooth and pleasant.  I can’t even get elected head of my own household; the wife has that position nailed down.</p>
<p>Man, can you imagine running for some office these days?  I am surprised as many people as do actually choose to undergo that gauntlet of stupidity and inanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LabDancer</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/comment-page-1/#comment-116388</link>
		<dc:creator>LabDancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/#comment-116388</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dreaming can be dangerous - you could end up being elected or something.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreaming can be dangerous &#8211; you could end up being elected or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmaz</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/comment-page-1/#comment-116386</link>
		<dc:creator>bmaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/scotus-a-go-go/#comment-116386</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Heh heh.  And as to your @74, a boy can still dream can’t he?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh heh.  And as to your @74, a boy can still dream can’t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
