<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Governor of Alaska Approves of Exxon v. Baker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:51:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MrWhy</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/comment-page-1/#comment-103362</link>
		<dc:creator>MrWhy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/#comment-103362</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mx_I-byng78&amp;feature=related&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Travelin’ Thru&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mx_I-byng78&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">Travelin’ Thru</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendanx</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/comment-page-1/#comment-103218</link>
		<dc:creator>brendanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/#comment-103218</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Rape Kit Billa from Wasilla.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rape Kit Billa from Wasilla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4jkb4ia</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/comment-page-1/#comment-103208</link>
		<dc:creator>4jkb4ia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/#comment-103208</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Korematsu was the first one that I thought of.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Korematsu was the first one that I thought of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4jkb4ia</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/comment-page-1/#comment-103207</link>
		<dc:creator>4jkb4ia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/#comment-103207</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am not the only one who turned on the baseball game because the debate was a foregone conclusion! Whew!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not the only one who turned on the baseball game because the debate was a foregone conclusion! Whew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freepatriot</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/comment-page-1/#comment-103189</link>
		<dc:creator>freepatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/#comment-103189</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Take heart. FWIW We reside in most conservative neighborhood of a world renowned seaside city on the central CA coast.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bolenas ???&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Take heart. FWIW We reside in most conservative neighborhood of a world renowned seaside city on the central CA coast.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bolenas ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/comment-page-1/#comment-103170</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/#comment-103170</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dickmacalive.blogspot.com/2008/10/finances.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Palin’s finances due&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dickmacalive.blogspot.com/2008/10/finances.html" rel="nofollow">Palin’s finances due</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rdwdkw</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/comment-page-1/#comment-103165</link>
		<dc:creator>rdwdkw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/#comment-103165</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Marci, please correct me if I am wrong, but doesn’t Palin believe that if her own husband raped her own daughter, her daughter should be forced to have the child and pay for the rape kit to prosecute him?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marci, please correct me if I am wrong, but doesn’t Palin believe that if her own husband raped her own daughter, her daughter should be forced to have the child and pay for the rape kit to prosecute him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masaccio</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/comment-page-1/#comment-103162</link>
		<dc:creator>masaccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/#comment-103162</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;These are good questions. They require either a yes or no answer, so when you don’t get either a yes or no, the moderator says: this is a yes or no question, please answer yes or no, and then you can explain as much as you want to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;People see this on TV all the time, and in fact, lawyers use this formulation all the time, so they expect the witness to respond yes or no, and if they don’t the viewer realizes that the witness is not being forthright.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are good questions. They require either a yes or no answer, so when you don’t get either a yes or no, the moderator says: this is a yes or no question, please answer yes or no, and then you can explain as much as you want to.</p>
<p>People see this on TV all the time, and in fact, lawyers use this formulation all the time, so they expect the witness to respond yes or no, and if they don’t the viewer realizes that the witness is not being forthright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anwaya</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/comment-page-1/#comment-103156</link>
		<dc:creator>anwaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/#comment-103156</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The following quotes are from Orwell’s Appendix to 1984, titled The Principles of Newspeak:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide  a  medium of  expression for  the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but  to make all other modes of  thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought — that  is,  a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc — should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought  is dependent  on  words.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Orwell continued:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pre-revolutionary   literature   could  only  be  subjected  to&lt;br /&gt;
ideological translation — that is, alteration in sense as well as language. Take for example the well-known passage  from  the Declaration of Independence:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;     We  hold  these truths to be self-evident, that all men&lt;br /&gt;
are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator  with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and  the  pursuit  of  happiness.  That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among  men,  deriving  their  powers from  the  consent  of  the governed. That whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of those ends, it is  the  right of  the  People  to  alter  or abolish it, and to institute new Government. . .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;     It would have been quite impossible to  render  this  into Newspeak  while  keeping  to  the  sense  of  the original. The nearest one could come to doing so  would  be  to  swallow  the whole passage  up in the single word crimethink.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are we not close? Does not Palin duckspeak?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following quotes are from Orwell’s Appendix to 1984, titled The Principles of Newspeak:</p>
<blockquote><p>The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide  a  medium of  expression for  the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but  to make all other modes of  thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought — that  is,  a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc — should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought  is dependent  on  words.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Orwell continued:</p>
<blockquote><p>Pre-revolutionary   literature   could  only  be  subjected  to<br />
ideological translation — that is, alteration in sense as well as language. Take for example the well-known passage  from  the Declaration of Independence:</p>
<blockquote><p>     We  hold  these truths to be self-evident, that all men<br />
are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator  with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and  the  pursuit  of  happiness.  That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among  men,  deriving  their  powers from  the  consent  of  the governed. That whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of those ends, it is  the  right of  the  People  to  alter  or abolish it, and to institute new Government. . .</p>
</blockquote>
<p>     It would have been quite impossible to  render  this  into Newspeak  while  keeping  to  the  sense  of  the original. The nearest one could come to doing so  would  be  to  swallow  the whole passage  up in the single word crimethink.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Are we not close? Does not Palin duckspeak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emptywheel</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/comment-page-1/#comment-103153</link>
		<dc:creator>emptywheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/the-governor-of-alaska-approves-of-exxon-v-baker/#comment-103153</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;1) Do you believe that the public should not pay to make emergency contraception available to rape victims.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Did you sign off on the plan to offer Murlene Wilkes an inflated workers comp package for lying in the TrooperGate investigation?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Do you believe that the public should not pay to make emergency contraception available to rape victims.</p>
<p>2) Did you sign off on the plan to offer Murlene Wilkes an inflated workers comp package for lying in the TrooperGate investigation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
