listen to him

every time he says “Barack Obama” or”My Opponent”, he’s really TALKIN ABOUT HIMSELF

it’s easy for mcsame to describe Obama as a cowardly sleezy lyin snake

mcsame turned into a cowardly sleezy lyin snake

so mcsame figures that Obama must have sold his soul too

it’s called “Projection” by psychiatrists

(fuck me, I spelled psychiatrists right the first time ???)

(now I gotta check my tinfoil)

we have a wiiiinnnnnaaah

how do we know that they didn’t do it, and then only post the fairly innocuous emails on the internet, thus giving her cover for deleting them all?

bmaz will tell you what you won …

next

fucker is a spook

and the term “naval intelligence always makes me wonder, which is smarter, an innies or outies ???

It’s a MASSIVE conspiricy

first we expand NATO

then we denounce and ATTACK NATO

why not ???

Without America, the rest of those guys are gonna get their asses kicked, you just know it

so we get all of our tanks parked along the Russian border, cut a deal with the ruskies, and turn our tanks around and drive right over those cheese eating surrender monkies

it’s quick, it’s evil, and it’s underhanded

I like it

I’m not sure if this is a moment of clarity, or pinholes in the tinfoil, but sign me up

and on an off-topic subject, can’t you people understand that sarah palin is the world’s leading expert on energy because she can see oil wells from her porch ???

us liberals need to get a clue (wink)

I’m hestitant to cite pornographers, but …Woodward’s latest book on the Bush presidency describes several incidents depicting the Bush White House acting extremely deferentially towards Senator McCain. The general thrust is that some in the White House saw [see] him as having more credibility in military matters, and in foreign policy issues heavy with military concerns [assuming there’s a difference in the Bush White House] than the Bush White House had [has]. Despite all that, and bearing in mind that some of the relevant passages are in Woodward’s typical style of word [or very close to it] for word [or very close to it], I didn’t read anything that demonstrated any clarity of conception, or any depth of analysis, or any insight into the issue at hand. Instead, one gets the picture of everyone walking on egg shells while this loose cannon rolls around the House.

Can anyone- anywhere- any time- produce even a single clearly articulated, non-ambivalent sustained passage, other than from when he’s squinting at a teleprompter, where Senator McCain has EVER demonstrated a level of intelligence beyond that of a journeyman professional boxer?

But hey! Prudential — Gibraltar — that’s Walter Cronkite! (”You Are There,” if you’re old enough.)

What could be more solid?