Here.
Fact One: After McCain appeared before a lime jello and cottage cheese background in June, Steve Schmidt swore that he would never let the campaign embarrass John McCain like that again.
Steve Schmidt, a senior adviser to Mr. McCain and a veteran of President Bush’s 2004 campaign, could barely hide his fury in the coming days, as he announced — to anyone who would listen — that he personally would make certain the McCain campaign would never again embarrass Mr. McCain.
“Fun Steve is dead,” Mr. Schmidt said.
Fact Two: After the lime jello cottage cheese incident, McCain had Evil Steve Schmidt take over the campaign.
Mr. Schmidt traveled with Mr. McCain for the first part of the year. But Mr. McCain sent him back to the headquarters in Crystal City, Va., after Republican complaints about Mr. McCain’s struggling campaign, epitomized by that Green Wall episode.
Mr. Schmidt gave the war room a more central place in Mr. McCain’s campaign, streamlining its decision making so only a few key aides decide what is worthy of response and, more important in Mr. Schmidt’s view, what presents an opportunity to attack Mr. Obama as elite, out of touch and lacking substance.
Fact Three: Thursday night, John McCain was once again embarrassed by being placed in front of a green backdrop–made even worse because it was an image of Walter Reed Middle School that should have been an image of Walter Reed hospital.
Three months after Mr. Schmidt’s “Fun Steve is dead” declaration, there was Mr. McCain giving his acceptance speech at the convention on Thursday night. His backdrop? A shimmering screen of green, until it was switched over to a more dignified blue.
Conclusion: AdNags and Jim Rutenberg conclude that this represents great improvement and the sign of a masterfully competent campaign, all thanks to Schmidt.
In the three months since that night in June, the McCain organization has become a campaign transformed: an elbows-out, risk-taking, disciplined machine that was on display last week at the convention that nominated Mr. McCain. And the catalyst for the change has largely been Mr. Schmidt, a 37-year-old veteran of the winning 2002 Congressional and 2004 presidential campaigns, where he worked closely with Karl Rove, then President Bush’s senior strategist.
Login Here





17 Comments
Spotlight



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Emptywheel
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
Isn’t it infuriating that the NYT doesn’t let people put up comments on its august reporters?
The “we so meant to do that” latest explanation for the Reed Middle School pic is pretty amusing, too. TPM reported Rick Davis admitting the error that evening & trying to blame someone else for it, now NYT buys into the backpedaling? Even the Reed staffers & parents aren’t swallowing that, though LAUSD would probably like them to.
Pale-lipped John Bush in front of that background looked like one of the figures I’ll be putting on the lawn to scare the kiddies next month for Halloween.
Yup, here’s the NYT’s other lizard-brain logic today.
dugg
This from The Straight Shooter.
Him and Cheney.
Texas sharpshooter fallacy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T…..er_fallacy
Here in Texas we call ‘em Bullshitters.
I love this kid!
http://www.trendhunter.com/tre…..alter-reed
One can only conclude that Bullet-head Steve gives great press head.
Hilarious!
Honestly, my 2nd thought after the one that they mixed up pix of Reed Middle School & WRAMC was, “The hell? Did McCain, in his odyssey through 20 schools before landing in Alexandria VA for high school…did he possibly go to Reed Middle School?
How his dad could have been stationed in the San Fernando Valley was a puzzlement, though.
EW great title to this I love it
“Green” means you don’t know what the hell you are doing.
Preliminary edits: “…where he worked closely with Karl Rove, then President Bush’s senior strategist, who was heavily implicated in the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame. Mr. Rove has also been implicated in the politicization of the US Dept of Justice, including the hiring of Kyle ‘the Aggregator’ Sampson and Monica Goodling, both of whom helped implemented a process by which career Justice Dept employees were hired on the basis of political affilliations with the GOP. One other result of this misuse of the DoJ for political purposes became evident in the firing of 8 USAGs for failing to align their conduct and workload with the political requirements of the virulently partisan GOP BushCheney administration.
In addition, Mr. Rove has been implicated by sworn testimony of an Alabama attorney for his role in the political persecution of former Governor Don Siegelman, in an effort to use Dept of Justice resources to ensure GOP gubanatorial and senate wins in that state by working with USAGs in the State of Alabama to bring charges against Siegelman, whose imprisonment raised such serious questions about politicization that he is currently released from an unusually long and severe sentence in a federal prison. Mr. Rove has refused to honor a Congressional subpoena to discuss this incident before the House Judiciary Committee, claiming Executive Privilege.
Rove is also heavily implicated in the Abramoff lobbying scandal, which has yet to result in full disclosures and federal charges. Given the linkages between Mr Abramoff and the use of Indian casinos for possible money laundering on behalf of the GOP, additional unanswered questions about Mr Rove’s legal and ethical conduct remain a shadow on the McCain campaign that result in Rove’s remaining ‘hidden in the background’ while advising Mr Schmidt…”
Okay… I could go on and on and on and on… but if I can do this off the top of my head on a Saturday afternoon… where’s MY paycheck from the NYT? Jeepers….
Bleh on Lizard Logic.
Some poor MSM folks never seem to get the perspective quite right.
For someone who spent the first 1/2 of the Presidential election season flat on his ass, I suppose getting up on one knee “represents great improvement.”
Journalists are paid to write, not evidently to think.
This is totally bizarre, but predictable. As Prof. Rosen has pointed out, the political press worships at the altar of savviness. Apparently Schmidt has built up so much savvy cred with the NYT that even the perfect re-creation of the disaster he swore to prevent (during the acceptance speech, no less) wasn’t enough to throw off the storyline.
Of course, why would total and abject failure at your stated goal matter when that fount of savviness, Karl Rove, endorse you. Right after the quote from Rove praising the campaign’s success since Schmidt took over, the NYT gets really strange.
Read these two paragraphs closely:
This is the NYT endorsing cynicism and lying about your opponent as a campaign strategy. Losers tell the truth with an elevated style of politicking. Apparently, the only problem with Schmidt’s strategy is when he doesn’t pull off the lie.
funny you should bring up “lime green” backgrounds. Watching Amy goodmans program on Friday, she is reviewing the convention and the lime green background is up. So is the sign that the Vets in the upper tiers put up “how can you win an occupation”.
The c-span cameras caught it that night, wonder if any of the MSMers showed the sign on the news?
Been poking around the Web some recognition in the established corporate media of the meaning Stewart & Colbert took from the RNC; no luck yet-
After last night’s extended dissection of how McMaverik was replaced by pod person McBush, I do not foresee McPOW on The Daily Show again- certainly not before Election Day
[which may do in the weaselly septegenarian scam artist*].
It was like Stewart was sending a break up letter:
Dear Senator McCain:
I know some called you nothing but a common carpetbagger. But over the course of more than a decade of semi-regular guest appearances on my show, you regaled my audience with taking pot shots at our established national power structure, portraying yourself as someone we could count on to Fight The Power, and proved yourself anything but ‘common’.
As I sat through that orgiastic ritual of anointing a leader based on who could scarfe down the most human brains, I realized not just that you were prepared to pander to them to get their endorsement, but that to become their leader you had committed to doing a full Zombie on the people of this country, betraying- worse: pissing on every single value you appeared to espouse, and it finally dawned on me: that whole time you were just lying. You lied & you lied & you lied some more- TO my face- IN my face- all to serve your lust for power.
In the interests of clarity here’s a little poem:
Where Republicans pander
And Democrats nag
You claimed to be different
You’re just a douche bag.
[* Mind you, I CAN picture the GOP machine having Sister Snarkya lift him up in her arms- I suspect she could do it- as his life force oozes out of his collapsed post-POW frame… passing on the torch to the Chukcheesian Candidate]
Colbert was even less subtle: right off the bat he brought up the Green Screen 2 and urged Colbert Nation to take a healthy snort of it & have at Old McBlood & Hypocrisy.
And he replayed his classic first season interview with House Repod scum Lynn Westmoreland, at the end of which the Georgia Not-A-Peach reflexively thanked him, cutting back to the current Colbert, his face set in the purest, cold-running pay back to Congressman Uppity: “You’re welcome, Congressman”.
My point in raising both this & the earlier comment on Stewart is that while the first was a 22 minute extended negative attack ad on McCain & this second was an invitation to YouTubia to let flee with the video bombs, both should serve to energize the 18 to 35 year olds the Obama campaign used to get the Dem nomination.
I don’t do this as well as freepatriot, so I’ll put it bluntly: this will be a bloodbath. And hopefully put an end to the Rove Administration.
Nobody does. it’s his form. he owns it.
Again, as I going boldly where all have gone before, in the manner of fdl’s legendary evilparalleluniverse, I recognize this stands to go MIA, but…
Neil- I tend to take your comment seriously because you’ve posted so many good ones in the past you’ve earned it. On this point, however, might I suggest a bit more…uhm…nuance.
The call-and-response dialogue format of the blogosphere still holds so much territory yet to be explored, but IMO there are also obvious shortcomings EG to get the sliced knowledge you often have to settle for short shrift
[Bill Shakespeare, utility infielder, Boston Braves circa 1920…either him or the guy who wrote Richard III
Reply