<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conyers to Turdblossom: If You&#8217;ll Talk to GQ and Fox, Why Not HJC?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:24:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: readerOfTeaLeaves</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/comment-page-1/#comment-64784</link>
		<dc:creator>readerOfTeaLeaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/#comment-64784</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Heh ;-))&lt;br /&gt;
I thought this bit was especially yummy-looking: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personal files and computers and backups, from home, laptop, or blackberry computers, used in relation to Siegelman or Wecht&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pardon me for swooning, but it looks like MadDogs and the regulars might have plenty to gnaw on as these tasty morsels spill out of HJC. I hope to learn a lot from their comments ;-))&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh ;-))<br />
I thought this bit was especially yummy-looking: </p>
<blockquote><p>Personal files and computers and backups, from home, laptop, or blackberry computers, used in relation to Siegelman or Wecht</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Pardon me for swooning, but it looks like MadDogs and the regulars might have plenty to gnaw on as these tasty morsels spill out of HJC. I hope to learn a lot from their comments ;-))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emptywheel</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/comment-page-1/#comment-64781</link>
		<dc:creator>emptywheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/#comment-64781</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That’s why I asked. Note some of the dates in the report are fairly recent, and fairly high ranking DOJ…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s why I asked. Note some of the dates in the report are fairly recent, and fairly high ranking DOJ…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: readerOfTeaLeaves</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/comment-page-1/#comment-64777</link>
		<dc:creator>readerOfTeaLeaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/#comment-64777</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here’s the list of servers they want searched&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Heh.  I plan to indulge in butter on my popcorn when Bu$hCo repeats, repeats, repeats that they don’t have the necessary items. No doubt the WH and DoJ are already howling about the ‘expense’ of meeting this request.&lt;br /&gt;
I hope Conyers reminds them that, ‘If we can spend $14.1 million &lt;em&gt;per hour&lt;/em&gt; in Iraq, we can spend a few hundred thousand to search a few servers and handheld devices.’&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where’s MadDogs?  And BillE?  And PJEvans? and the rest of the techies…?!&lt;br /&gt;
My hunch: Conyers gots emails.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Here’s the list of servers they want searched</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Heh.  I plan to indulge in butter on my popcorn when Bu$hCo repeats, repeats, repeats that they don’t have the necessary items. No doubt the WH and DoJ are already howling about the ‘expense’ of meeting this request.<br />
I hope Conyers reminds them that, ‘If we can spend $14.1 million <em>per hour</em> in Iraq, we can spend a few hundred thousand to search a few servers and handheld devices.’</p>
<p>Where’s MadDogs?  And BillE?  And PJEvans? and the rest of the techies…?!<br />
My hunch: Conyers gots emails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BooRadley</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/comment-page-1/#comment-64721</link>
		<dc:creator>BooRadley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/#comment-64721</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks ew.&lt;br /&gt;
We’re making progress.&lt;br /&gt;
It’s maddeningly slow, but it’s definitely progress. God/science/whatever bless Conyers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks ew.<br />
We’re making progress.<br />
It’s maddeningly slow, but it’s definitely progress. God/science/whatever bless Conyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perris</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/comment-page-1/#comment-64719</link>
		<dc:creator>perris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/#comment-64719</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Between Yoo and Rove, Solicitor Paul Clement is going to have to invent a whole new kind of privilege to protect those willing to blab to the press but not to Congressional committees. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the problem marcy is, they don’t care, they will invent a new kind of priviledge&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;they are brazen, they are sociopaths, they do not care&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;they will claim priviledge&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Between Yoo and Rove, Solicitor Paul Clement is going to have to invent a whole new kind of privilege to protect those willing to blab to the press but not to Congressional committees. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>the problem marcy is, they don’t care, they will invent a new kind of priviledge</p>
<p>they are brazen, they are sociopaths, they do not care</p>
<p>they will claim priviledge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BayStateLibrul</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/comment-page-1/#comment-64715</link>
		<dc:creator>BayStateLibrul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/#comment-64715</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, and we’ll get to see Luskin by his side as Rover dodges, darts, and cons the Committee…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and we’ll get to see Luskin by his side as Rover dodges, darts, and cons the Committee…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bushie</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/comment-page-1/#comment-64714</link>
		<dc:creator>Bushie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/#comment-64714</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This request for servers, backups etc brought a viseral reaction to me.  How many hard drives, servers, tapes, disks, etc from Bushco will be missing/wiped by 1.20.09?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This request for servers, backups etc brought a viseral reaction to me.  How many hard drives, servers, tapes, disks, etc from Bushco will be missing/wiped by 1.20.09?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: readerOfTeaLeaves</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/comment-page-1/#comment-64708</link>
		<dc:creator>readerOfTeaLeaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/#comment-64708</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;EW wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;For example, it reveals that Scrushy’s lawyer Art Leach believed he had made a plea deal with the prosecutors, only to have that deal rejected by someone higher than Criminal Division head &lt;strong&gt;Alice Fischer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cue up the creepy soundtrack.&lt;br /&gt;
…Alice Fisher… now, where have we heard that name before…?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let’s hope Conyers and his fellow Committee members create rigorous, tight response guidelines for Rove, et al.  Formulating questions that require ONLY a yes/no, or true/false response might be a good start. Else, Rove will probably make Abu Gonzo look like a clear talker, and the Committee look like  pack of droning fools.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EW wrote:
</p>
<blockquote><p>For example, it reveals that Scrushy’s lawyer Art Leach believed he had made a plea deal with the prosecutors, only to have that deal rejected by someone higher than Criminal Division head <strong>Alice Fischer</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>.</p>
<p>Cue up the creepy soundtrack.<br />
…Alice Fisher… now, where have we heard that name before…?</p>
<p>Let’s hope Conyers and his fellow Committee members create rigorous, tight response guidelines for Rove, et al.  Formulating questions that require ONLY a yes/no, or true/false response might be a good start. Else, Rove will probably make Abu Gonzo look like a clear talker, and the Committee look like  pack of droning fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skilly</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/comment-page-1/#comment-64704</link>
		<dc:creator>Skilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/17/conyers-to-turdblossom-if-youll-talk-to-gq-and-fox-why-not-hjc/#comment-64704</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Could I be first for once?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could I be first for once?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
