<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain&#8217;s Favors for Iseman Involved Helping Far Right-Wing Families to Sustain their Shell Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:07:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rkilowatt</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-54606</link>
		<dc:creator>rkilowatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/#comment-54606</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;fyi, Just left this as #95 on Rick Renzi thread:&lt;br /&gt;
re usefullness, immediate or future, of personnel placed in position:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;L. Fletcher Prouty [played by D.Sutherland in movie JFK] wrote The Secret Team in the 1970’s outlining just this scenario. Reading it will preclude doing repetitive spadework. The nuggets are there to be used.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fyi, Just left this as #95 on Rick Renzi thread:<br />
re usefullness, immediate or future, of personnel placed in position:</p>
<p>L. Fletcher Prouty [played by D.Sutherland in movie JFK] wrote The Secret Team in the 1970’s outlining just this scenario. Reading it will preclude doing repetitive spadework. The nuggets are there to be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnLopresti</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-54604</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnLopresti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/#comment-54604</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the title of ew’s post assembles some important features of the McCain campaign in 2008.  It is worthwhile, as well to review the tv media ownership dynamic historically as the dotcom expansion taper began, synchronizing with the then approaching 2000 campaigns, with respect to the kinds of disputes and spectrum plans fcc was anticipating at that time.  Reed Hundt’s tenure ended, and Kennard’s was to brook the chasm between the Clinton and Bush presidencies; soon it became clear where Powell intended to take the agency.  Having both television market oversight and internet planning watchdogging emanate from the same commission is a way to balance fcc’s portfolio; so some measure of the easing of Paxson’s road to micromonopoly was riding that inevitable wave of consolidation, yet in a way, for Kennard’s span, which would continue to foster controls on wider oligarchism in public media.  There is more to find in this topic; it is excellent timing that already it has denatured McCains’ facade of imperviousness to influence peddling.  My reading of his campaign regulatory reform is its actual content is similarly vacuous, simply if one compares the title of the final law to the effects intended by the details of the law contents.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the title of ew’s post assembles some important features of the McCain campaign in 2008.  It is worthwhile, as well to review the tv media ownership dynamic historically as the dotcom expansion taper began, synchronizing with the then approaching 2000 campaigns, with respect to the kinds of disputes and spectrum plans fcc was anticipating at that time.  Reed Hundt’s tenure ended, and Kennard’s was to brook the chasm between the Clinton and Bush presidencies; soon it became clear where Powell intended to take the agency.  Having both television market oversight and internet planning watchdogging emanate from the same commission is a way to balance fcc’s portfolio; so some measure of the easing of Paxson’s road to micromonopoly was riding that inevitable wave of consolidation, yet in a way, for Kennard’s span, which would continue to foster controls on wider oligarchism in public media.  There is more to find in this topic; it is excellent timing that already it has denatured McCains’ facade of imperviousness to influence peddling.  My reading of his campaign regulatory reform is its actual content is similarly vacuous, simply if one compares the title of the final law to the effects intended by the details of the law contents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loo Hoo.</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-54602</link>
		<dc:creator>Loo Hoo.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/#comment-54602</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gotta appreciate multi-tasking, I guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta appreciate multi-tasking, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmaz</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-54601</link>
		<dc:creator>bmaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/#comment-54601</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No problem at all for Good Time Charlie.  He does all of his lobbying from his cell phone while riding around in the Straight &lt;strike&gt;Cock&lt;/strike&gt; Talk Express.  Seriously.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem at all for Good Time Charlie.  He does all of his lobbying from his cell phone while riding around in the Straight <strike>Cock</strike> Talk Express.  Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loo Hoo.</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-54600</link>
		<dc:creator>Loo Hoo.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/#comment-54600</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whoo boy&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charlie Black, who serves as McCain’s chief political adviser, “is chairman of one of Washington’s lobbying powerhouses, BKSH and Associates, which has represented AT&amp;T, Alcoa, JPMorgan and U.S. Airways.” Though he is currently playing a prominent role in the McCain campaign, Black “is still being paid by his firm.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Friday, Black told the National Journal that he doesn’t think his continued lobbying is a problem for the anti-lobbying image of his “client,” John McCain:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/" rel="nofollow">Whoo boy</a>:</p>
<p>Charlie Black, who serves as McCain’s chief political adviser, “is chairman of one of Washington’s lobbying powerhouses, BKSH and Associates, which has represented AT&amp;T, Alcoa, JPMorgan and U.S. Airways.” Though he is currently playing a prominent role in the McCain campaign, Black “is still being paid by his firm.”</p>
<p>On Friday, Black told the National Journal that he doesn’t think his continued lobbying is a problem for the anti-lobbying image of his “client,” John McCain:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prostratedragon</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-54599</link>
		<dc:creator>prostratedragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/#comment-54599</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah. This one’s pretty good, too…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
“It strikes me that a lot of coders have a somewhat detached view of the world, and it’s reasonable to assume that Hans might not even have stopped to think about how things looked,” said Rick Moen, a local area network consultant in Menlo Park.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;considering that inter alia “things” include soaked floorboards and a notable lack of interest in the search for his missing wife.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Make suitable changes at “coders” and “Hans” and you’ve got a pretty good if mild commentary on people who thought McCain, e.g., should be running for President.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah. This one’s pretty good, too…</p>
<blockquote><p>
“It strikes me that a lot of coders have a somewhat detached view of the world, and it’s reasonable to assume that Hans might not even have stopped to think about how things looked,” said Rick Moen, a local area network consultant in Menlo Park.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>considering that inter alia “things” include soaked floorboards and a notable lack of interest in the search for his missing wife.</p>
<p>Make suitable changes at “coders” and “Hans” and you’ve got a pretty good if mild commentary on people who thought McCain, e.g., should be running for President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmaz</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-54598</link>
		<dc:creator>bmaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/#comment-54598</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I might have left out the best line in the story:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;In any event, Sturgeon reportedly has insisted that whatever his crimes, he had nothing to do with Nina’s disappearance. Wired quoted him as saying that, in the Reiser case, he is red herring, or rather, he said, “a red Sturgeon.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I might have left out the best line in the story:</p>
<blockquote><p>In any event, Sturgeon reportedly has insisted that whatever his crimes, he had nothing to do with Nina’s disappearance. Wired quoted him as saying that, in the Reiser case, he is red herring, or rather, he said, “a red Sturgeon.”</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prostratedragon</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-54597</link>
		<dc:creator>prostratedragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/#comment-54597</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Shriek!!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; (I &lt;i&gt;guess&lt;/i&gt; that’s with laughter.) I was still trying to absorb that the dude’s name was really Sturgeon, when I came to the end …&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><b>Shriek!!</b></i> (I <i>guess</i> that’s with laughter.) I was still trying to absorb that the dude’s name was really Sturgeon, when I came to the end …</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankProbst</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-54596</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankProbst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/#comment-54596</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While I’m venting, can I please call bullshit on one of McCain’s talking points?  He claims that he wrote letters urging the FCC to speed up their review of some deal, and he says that this is okay, since he didn’t try to influence their decision to accept or reject the deal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, he did.  He signaled to the FCC that this deal was important to him, and he wanted the decision made quickly.  In Washington, that can only mean he wanted a “yes” decision.  Had he wanted a “no” decision, he would have written them a letter telling them to drag their feet as much as possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I’m venting, can I please call bullshit on one of McCain’s talking points?  He claims that he wrote letters urging the FCC to speed up their review of some deal, and he says that this is okay, since he didn’t try to influence their decision to accept or reject the deal.</p>
<p>Yes, he did.  He signaled to the FCC that this deal was important to him, and he wanted the decision made quickly.  In Washington, that can only mean he wanted a “yes” decision.  Had he wanted a “no” decision, he would have written them a letter telling them to drag their feet as much as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankProbst</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-54595</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankProbst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/23/mccains-favors-for-iseman-involved-allowing-far-right-wing-families-to-sustain-their-shell-companies/#comment-54595</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is bizarre pushback, though.  Paxson has said he met with McCain.  McCain has previously testified UNDER OATH that the two of them talked.  Now Goodman is saying that he (Goodman) never met with McCain, and therefore he doubts that Paxon did?  Am I the only one that fails to see the logic of this?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is bizarre pushback, though.  Paxson has said he met with McCain.  McCain has previously testified UNDER OATH that the two of them talked.  Now Goodman is saying that he (Goodman) never met with McCain, and therefore he doubts that Paxon did?  Am I the only one that fails to see the logic of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
