<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GAO to White House: We Hate to Say We Told You So, But We Told You So</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:48:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsAnnaNOLA</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45603</link>
		<dc:creator>MsAnnaNOLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45603</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey EW I couldn’t comment on the next post (Tony Fratto) because of site weirdness….but FWIW:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems to me if there is a giant stack of whitehouse emails that are discoverable for a period of time where bad things happened, isn’t it possible that the only way to know what is there is to just print it all out and go through it. I mean we have huge document dumps regularly. Why not doc dump these on some investigators and get it out there. Maybe give the doc dump to a special prosecutor? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am no expert in these matters but sometimes low tech is the only way to get stuff done. I mean if “not archived properly” is the question…well lets figure out a way to find it. If you can figure out why it is missing it seems like you could just send it all to the printer and voila…lots of boring reading but there may be a few jems in there. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ok a little snark…so if the print method doesn’t work maybe we can just get one of those “data mining” programs (like the CIA or whoever did TALON) to go through the email archives… ya know look for key word like Karl Rove, US Atty, Flame, Plame, Novak, and so on and so forth. Seems like there may be lots to go through but then again in the interest of justice I am sure many would volunteer to go through it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey EW I couldn’t comment on the next post (Tony Fratto) because of site weirdness….but FWIW:</p>
<p>It seems to me if there is a giant stack of whitehouse emails that are discoverable for a period of time where bad things happened, isn’t it possible that the only way to know what is there is to just print it all out and go through it. I mean we have huge document dumps regularly. Why not doc dump these on some investigators and get it out there. Maybe give the doc dump to a special prosecutor? </p>
<p>I am no expert in these matters but sometimes low tech is the only way to get stuff done. I mean if “not archived properly” is the question…well lets figure out a way to find it. If you can figure out why it is missing it seems like you could just send it all to the printer and voila…lots of boring reading but there may be a few jems in there. </p>
<p>Ok a little snark…so if the print method doesn’t work maybe we can just get one of those “data mining” programs (like the CIA or whoever did TALON) to go through the email archives… ya know look for key word like Karl Rove, US Atty, Flame, Plame, Novak, and so on and so forth. Seems like there may be lots to go through but then again in the interest of justice I am sure many would volunteer to go through it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watercarrier4diogenes</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45538</link>
		<dc:creator>watercarrier4diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45538</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nahh, he’s too busy setting up the whiz-bang giveaway of telecom immunity/bush immunity and warrantless wiretapping.  I’m for adding him to CTuttle’s list @10.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nahh, he’s too busy setting up the whiz-bang giveaway of telecom immunity/bush immunity and warrantless wiretapping.  I’m for adding him to CTuttle’s list @10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ Matt</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45528</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45528</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;From the GAO report:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;In its July 2007 report, the administration cited satisfactory progress with this benchmark because the Ministry of Finance was releasing funds to ministries and provinces. The U.S. Embassy reported that the Ministry of Finance released 25 percent and 10 percent of 2007 capital project and reconstruction budget funds to ministries and provinces, respectively, in the first 5 months of the year. However, funding releases are not expenditures and may not be a reliable indicator of future spending by ministries and provinces. The administration’s report noted that capacity constraints and security problems may affect Iraq’s ability to accelerate its spending and procurement activities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GAO to Congress, the Bushies are Spinnnnnning like crazy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the GAO report:</p>
<blockquote><p>In its July 2007 report, the administration cited satisfactory progress with this benchmark because the Ministry of Finance was releasing funds to ministries and provinces. The U.S. Embassy reported that the Ministry of Finance released 25 percent and 10 percent of 2007 capital project and reconstruction budget funds to ministries and provinces, respectively, in the first 5 months of the year. However, funding releases are not expenditures and may not be a reliable indicator of future spending by ministries and provinces. The administration’s report noted that capacity constraints and security problems may affect Iraq’s ability to accelerate its spending and procurement activities.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>GAO to Congress, the Bushies are Spinnnnnning like crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45526</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45526</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Iraqi central government is extremely weak and ineffective.  The new law on Baathists is a case in point.  It has little or no ability to enforce it, and it is not clear that the new law even if it could be implemented would really change anything.  It might even be worse than the current policy.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Similarly, the central government lacks the mechanisms to spend money allocated for reconstruction.  Since a lot of this would be lost or stolen anyway, it leaves me with the impression that it can’t even steal effectively.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Iraqi central government is extremely weak and ineffective.  The new law on Baathists is a case in point.  It has little or no ability to enforce it, and it is not clear that the new law even if it could be implemented would really change anything.  It might even be worse than the current policy.  </p>
<p>Similarly, the central government lacks the mechanisms to spend money allocated for reconstruction.  Since a lot of this would be lost or stolen anyway, it leaves me with the impression that it can’t even steal effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexBetsy</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45525</link>
		<dc:creator>TexBetsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45525</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other words, the Administration went to the Iraqi government, said, “we’d like to give you a passing grade on this issue, so tell us what we want to hear.” And voila! Instant propaganda, all ready and packaged to persuade the American people to dump billions more into this money sinkhole of a war.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi EW.  Great explanation of how propoganda works!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In other words, the Administration went to the Iraqi government, said, “we’d like to give you a passing grade on this issue, so tell us what we want to hear.” And voila! Instant propaganda, all ready and packaged to persuade the American people to dump billions more into this money sinkhole of a war.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hi EW.  Great explanation of how propoganda works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapMidnight</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45524</link>
		<dc:creator>CapMidnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45524</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Has &lt;b&gt;Harry Reid&lt;/b&gt; scheduled a Senate vote to censure &lt;b&gt;GAO&lt;/b&gt; for a report that might make &lt;b&gt;Petraeus&lt;/b&gt; cry?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has <b>Harry Reid</b> scheduled a Senate vote to censure <b>GAO</b> for a report that might make <b>Petraeus</b> cry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTuttle</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45522</link>
		<dc:creator>CTuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45522</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’m still hoping that someone’s words will put them all behind bars.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AGAG’s, TurdBlossom’s, Addington’s, Yoo’s, Bybee’s, Meir’s,… ad nauseum…  At least one, anyone…???&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m still hoping that someone’s words will put them all behind bars.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>AGAG’s, TurdBlossom’s, Addington’s, Yoo’s, Bybee’s, Meir’s,… ad nauseum…  At least one, anyone…???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phred</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45520</link>
		<dc:creator>phred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45520</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My dad always thought that saying was exactly backwards — broken bones will heal, but certain words will stick with you forever.  And in the case of BushCo, I’m still hoping that someone’s words will put them all behind bars.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dad always thought that saying was exactly backwards — broken bones will heal, but certain words will stick with you forever.  And in the case of BushCo, I’m still hoping that someone’s words will put them all behind bars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ Matt</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45516</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45516</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;EW-  Here is the long version of the GAO report:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d071195.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SECURING, STABILIZING, AND REBUILDING IRAQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EW-  Here is the long version of the GAO report:<br />
<a href="http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d071195.pdf" rel="nofollow">SECURING, STABILIZING, AND REBUILDING IRAQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tross</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45509</link>
		<dc:creator>Tross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/gao-to-white-house-we-hate-to-say-we-told-you-so-but-we-told-you-so/#comment-45509</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If Congress doesn’t do anything about this (and I don’t expect that they will) they better not say a word to President Clint/Edw/Obama about fiscal responsibility in the next 8 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, we know the fiscal conservatives will spontaneously re-appear around mid-January, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Congress doesn’t do anything about this (and I don’t expect that they will) they better not say a word to President Clint/Edw/Obama about fiscal responsibility in the next 8 years.</p>
<p>Of course, we know the fiscal conservatives will spontaneously re-appear around mid-January, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.238 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 22:38:25 -->

