<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disappearing White House Emails Timeline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:07:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PetePierce</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-45541</link>
		<dc:creator>PetePierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/#comment-45541</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another excellent timeline Marcy.  My concept of the emails and everything else Bushie/DOJ complicit coverup facilitated now by Sylvio Dante Mukasey is very simple.  They ain’t savin’ notin’ ’bout notin’ and damn the at least  two federal code sections that say they had to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hatch Act/Presidential Records Act&lt;/strong&gt;–Addington and Gillespie and Fielding’s Response–*g* to the 64th power—”You want it friggin when?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ordinary citizen or company destrying emails the US Attorney wants in a run of the mill case =TOAST.  But not the Bushies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a loan commerical where executives are shooting the tiny people asking for loans around like paper wads.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every time something like this comes up, probably about once a  month, Addington, Cheney, Fielding, Gillespie and sometimes Lil Bushie gather and all but the Born Again teetotaler swig some of the favorite booze laughing at all the fretting over little things like destroying email and tape backups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, I got hold of Marcy’s book today, so I’ll have the opportunity to get a nice fresh look at the Fitz investigation that stopped so short–possibly largely because the White House Lawyers and DOJ obstructed justice by destroying emails–because of the US Attorney scandle, and because of the Plame leak and a gamut of other issues,  and I suspect a big part of why Fitz did not indict Cheney and Rove was that he couldn’t get the emails that they of course either deleted, or just won’t give him (same with the tape backups).  It’s not exactly the situation where they get a warrant to search some bimbo’s (Deomcatic Congressman–same thing) house and freezer with $96,000 in it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another excellent timeline Marcy.  My concept of the emails and everything else Bushie/DOJ complicit coverup facilitated now by Sylvio Dante Mukasey is very simple.  They ain’t savin’ notin’ ’bout notin’ and damn the at least  two federal code sections that say they had to.</p>
<p><strong>Hatch Act/Presidential Records Act</strong>–Addington and Gillespie and Fielding’s Response–*g* to the 64th power—”You want it friggin when?”</p>
<p>Ordinary citizen or company destrying emails the US Attorney wants in a run of the mill case =TOAST.  But not the Bushies.</p>
<p>There is a loan commerical where executives are shooting the tiny people asking for loans around like paper wads.</p>
<p>Every time something like this comes up, probably about once a  month, Addington, Cheney, Fielding, Gillespie and sometimes Lil Bushie gather and all but the Born Again teetotaler swig some of the favorite booze laughing at all the fretting over little things like destroying email and tape backups.</p>
<p>Fortunately, I got hold of Marcy’s book today, so I’ll have the opportunity to get a nice fresh look at the Fitz investigation that stopped so short–possibly largely because the White House Lawyers and DOJ obstructed justice by destroying emails–because of the US Attorney scandle, and because of the Plame leak and a gamut of other issues,  and I suspect a big part of why Fitz did not indict Cheney and Rove was that he couldn’t get the emails that they of course either deleted, or just won’t give him (same with the tape backups).  It’s not exactly the situation where they get a warrant to search some bimbo’s (Deomcatic Congressman–same thing) house and freezer with $96,000 in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadDog</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-45539</link>
		<dc:creator>MadDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/#comment-45539</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just to clarify, “secure” in this case (eg: https) means SSL or TLS (eg: encryption and “signing” protocols) layer on an HTTP server. WH email clients (outlook, apparently) can be set up so SSL/TLS is seamless (requires no intervention by use) . I have no idea if SSL is WH protocol, but would make sense AFAIC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, IMO https line you reference doesn’t necessarily mean returned email (Martin’s) was “secure”, only that the access to server being queried was. There’s no header info for that email, so no way to tell if it was SSL/TLS encoded. I’m aware that some email/Exchange implentations now use https, however I’ve written and seen a lot of it and usually it goes through standard email protocols (SMTP), customized raw TCP/IP… could be through VPN, STUNNEL etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My wording was perhaps adding to the confusion, but what I “meant” was that whoever was doing this &lt;a href=&quot;http://static1.firedoglake.com/28/files//2008/01/us-v-libby-dx1553-wilson-qa.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;querying&lt;/a&gt;, had to logon to do it wrt to this “https” query.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My take is that this is a web-based application running on the White House’s Intranet (not In&lt;b&gt;ter&lt;/b&gt;net) that is only available on the EOP network and that it requires one to “logon” in order to do the query. It may also need the “logon” because it is accessing “secure” content.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is instead of this &lt;a href=&quot;http://static1.firedoglake.com/28/files//2008/01/us-v-libby-dx1541-martin-to-mayfield.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;query&lt;/a&gt; which apparently can be accessed, again via a web-based application running on the EOP network, by anyone on that network. No “logon” to the web-based query application is required for this query, hence the normal “http” URL. I would guess that using this EOP network-based web application, one can &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; access stuff that is deemed “unclassified”.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Just to clarify, “secure” in this case (eg: https) means SSL or TLS (eg: encryption and “signing” protocols) layer on an HTTP server. WH email clients (outlook, apparently) can be set up so SSL/TLS is seamless (requires no intervention by use) . I have no idea if SSL is WH protocol, but would make sense AFAIC.</p>
<p>However, IMO https line you reference doesn’t necessarily mean returned email (Martin’s) was “secure”, only that the access to server being queried was. There’s no header info for that email, so no way to tell if it was SSL/TLS encoded. I’m aware that some email/Exchange implentations now use https, however I’ve written and seen a lot of it and usually it goes through standard email protocols (SMTP), customized raw TCP/IP… could be through VPN, STUNNEL etc.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>My wording was perhaps adding to the confusion, but what I “meant” was that whoever was doing this <a href="http://static1.firedoglake.com/28/files//2008/01/us-v-libby-dx1553-wilson-qa.pdf" rel="nofollow">querying</a>, had to logon to do it wrt to this “https” query.</p>
<p>My take is that this is a web-based application running on the White House’s Intranet (not In<b>ter</b>net) that is only available on the EOP network and that it requires one to “logon” in order to do the query. It may also need the “logon” because it is accessing “secure” content.</p>
<p>This is instead of this <a href="http://static1.firedoglake.com/28/files//2008/01/us-v-libby-dx1541-martin-to-mayfield.pdf" rel="nofollow">query</a> which apparently can be accessed, again via a web-based application running on the EOP network, by anyone on that network. No “logon” to the web-based query application is required for this query, hence the normal “http” URL. I would guess that using this EOP network-based web application, one can <i>only</i> access stuff that is deemed “unclassified”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobschacht</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-45532</link>
		<dc:creator>bobschacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/#comment-45532</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt; In response to  Mary @ 47&lt;br /&gt;
Just to be pedantic…&lt;br /&gt;
    That joins pigs and snakes on the list of things not likely to fly&lt;br /&gt;
From flyingsnake.org&lt;br /&gt;
    Flying snakes are a small group of species of tree snakes that live in South and Southeast Asia.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ha! I’ll bet they’re from &lt;strong&gt;Thailand!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> In response to  Mary @ 47<br />
Just to be pedantic…<br />
    That joins pigs and snakes on the list of things not likely to fly<br />
From flyingsnake.org<br />
    Flying snakes are a small group of species of tree snakes that live in South and Southeast Asia.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ha! I’ll bet they’re from <strong>Thailand!</strong></p>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnLopresti</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-45531</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnLopresti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/#comment-45531</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe the furnitureMZM contractor who did someIT as well in some of the cases ew followed from the vicinity of Duke and Lam, helped preserve the unmigrated emailServers; the way I remember, a lot of the early incidents were in the relevant timeframe, though Lam’s eventual ascent up the $MM LewisLadder occurred during the principalPurge2006 of usAttys.  I rarely hear of the tabloid stuff, but evidently the atty on that case is a known conspicuous advocate for the lurid.  I think there was a shell airCorp part of that investigation, as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the furnitureMZM contractor who did someIT as well in some of the cases ew followed from the vicinity of Duke and Lam, helped preserve the unmigrated emailServers; the way I remember, a lot of the early incidents were in the relevant timeframe, though Lam’s eventual ascent up the $MM LewisLadder occurred during the principalPurge2006 of usAttys.  I rarely hear of the tabloid stuff, but evidently the atty on that case is a known conspicuous advocate for the lurid.  I think there was a shell airCorp part of that investigation, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radiofreewill</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-45519</link>
		<dc:creator>radiofreewill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/#comment-45519</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, WO! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That was certainly a well-documented Clusterfuck! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, basically, the Saga of Mail2 was but one sorry episode of several that resulted in, as I read the timeline, a net five out of the eight years of the Clinton/Gore Administration, OVP had serious Tape Back-Up issues. In the case of Mail2, the “case-senitivity” and “names starting with D” problems were bad enough, but the real damage got done through a penny-pinched Tape-cycling process that, effectively, ‘disappeared’ archival data no more than two years after its creation, and in some cases, much sooner. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are Records subject to the PRA!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And, going by the Gallant deposition, Clinton and Gore weren’t really interested in ‘fixing’ the problem, much less ‘righting the wrong’ by restoring the Mail2 e-mails to ARMS - which it appears was never actually accomplished.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, WO! </p>
<p>That was certainly a well-documented Clusterfuck! </p>
<p>So, basically, the Saga of Mail2 was but one sorry episode of several that resulted in, as I read the timeline, a net five out of the eight years of the Clinton/Gore Administration, OVP had serious Tape Back-Up issues. In the case of Mail2, the “case-senitivity” and “names starting with D” problems were bad enough, but the real damage got done through a penny-pinched Tape-cycling process that, effectively, ‘disappeared’ archival data no more than two years after its creation, and in some cases, much sooner. </p>
<p>These are Records subject to the PRA!</p>
<p>And, going by the Gallant deposition, Clinton and Gore weren’t really interested in ‘fixing’ the problem, much less ‘righting the wrong’ by restoring the Mail2 e-mails to ARMS &#8211; which it appears was never actually accomplished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watercarrier4diogenes</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-45517</link>
		<dc:creator>watercarrier4diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/#comment-45517</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tony Fratto appears to have contracted a case of diarrhea of the mouth:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/01/white_house_suggests_no_email.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://talkingpointsmemo.com/n....._email.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony Fratto appears to have contracted a case of diarrhea of the mouth:</p>
<p><a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/01/white_house_suggests_no_email.php" rel="nofollow">http://talkingpointsmemo.com/n&#8230;.._email.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WilliamOckham</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-45483</link>
		<dc:creator>WilliamOckham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/#comment-45483</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;rfw,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Get the whole story from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01446.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GAO&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suggest the following addition to the timeline:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;April 2001 - GAO report on problems with ARMS and emails from the VP’s office in the Clinton Administration.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rfw,</p>
<p>Get the whole story from the <a href="http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01446.pdf" rel="nofollow">GAO</a>.</p>
<p>I suggest the following addition to the timeline:</p>
<p>April 2001 &#8211; GAO report on problems with ARMS and emails from the VP’s office in the Clinton Administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-45481</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/#comment-45481</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OT but near and dear to our hearts, Re: EW’s “&lt;a href=&quot;http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/11/bank-of-america-buys-a-big-chunk-of-the-shitpile/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bank of America Buys Big Chuck of the Shitpile &lt;/a&gt;“&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1691&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Waxman to hold hearings on executive compensation &lt;/a&gt;resulting from big shitpile merger consolidation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;As part of its ongoing investigation into executive pay, the Oversight Committee asked Countrywide Financial, Citigroup, and Merrill Lynch to provide documents relevant to the compensation of Angelo R. Mozilo, Charles Prince and E. Stanley O’Neal. In addition, the Committee invited the chairs of the compensation committees at these companies to testify on February 7 about how the compensation and severance packages for these executives were determined and on what basis they were approved.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT but near and dear to our hearts, Re: EW’s “<a href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/11/bank-of-america-buys-a-big-chunk-of-the-shitpile/" rel="nofollow">Bank of America Buys Big Chuck of the Shitpile </a>“</p>
<p>.<br />
<a href="http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1691" rel="nofollow">Waxman to hold hearings on executive compensation </a>resulting from big shitpile merger consolidation.
</p>
<blockquote><p>As part of its ongoing investigation into executive pay, the Oversight Committee asked Countrywide Financial, Citigroup, and Merrill Lynch to provide documents relevant to the compensation of Angelo R. Mozilo, Charles Prince and E. Stanley O’Neal. In addition, the Committee invited the chairs of the compensation committees at these companies to testify on February 7 about how the compensation and severance packages for these executives were determined and on what basis they were approved.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phred</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-45478</link>
		<dc:creator>phred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/#comment-45478</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Titans?  Really?  On purpose?  Who knew?  ; )&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I think it was just as well that the Cowboys’ season ended when it did — the stress was clearly too much for them ; )&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Titans?  Really?  On purpose?  Who knew?  ; )</p>
<p>Yeah, I think it was just as well that the Cowboys’ season ended when it did — the stress was clearly too much for them ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radiofreewill</title>
		<link>http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-45474</link>
		<dc:creator>radiofreewill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/disappearing-white-house-emails-timeline/#comment-45474</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Any idea what the domain (eg: owarm) in that search link you reference may be?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jd - I’m guessing that’s a recovery directory: Short for Over-Written Automated Records Management (owarm) file directory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The deposition in my 52 alludes to the Northrup Grumman Contractors having a ‘reconstruction’ process for Mail2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;owarm is what I would have named my Target directory as output for my script to recover the data with over-written headers, but that’s only a guess by me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Any idea what the domain (eg: owarm) in that search link you reference may be?”</p>
<p>jd &#8211; I’m guessing that’s a recovery directory: Short for Over-Written Automated Records Management (owarm) file directory.</p>
<p>The deposition in my 52 alludes to the Northrup Grumman Contractors having a ‘reconstruction’ process for Mail2.</p>
<p>owarm is what I would have named my Target directory as output for my script to recover the data with over-written headers, but that’s only a guess by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
